Free consultation. Clear plan. Serious defense.
Vehicular Manslaughter in Nevada
These cases are emotionally and legally intense. The defense usually turns on causation, negligence, reconstruction evidence, and whether the state can prove the required level of fault.
Button rotates automatically on each page load.
Vehicular Manslaughter
Vehicular manslaughter addresses deaths proximately caused by an act or omission that constitutes simple negligence while driving or in actual physical control of a vehicle.
NRS 484B.657 defines vehicular manslaughter as causing death through simple negligence while driving or in actual physical control of a vehicle.
Example fact patterns
Examples of factual situations prosecutors commonly rely on when filing charges. These are simplified summaries, details matter.
Examples of defenses
Short, plain-English examples of defenses we look for. The right defense depends on the facts, the evidence, and how the case was built.
Potential penalties
A simplified overview of common penalty ranges. The real exposure depends on charge level, priors, enhancements, and how the case is filed.
What is vehicular manslaughter in Nevada
Vehicular manslaughter is generally described as an unintentional death caused by a vehicle, where the state alleges the defendant was the proximate cause and the death resulted from an act or omission that amounts to simple negligence.
Most cases are fought on causation and fault. A tragic result does not automatically prove criminal negligence.
What level of intent is required
Vehicular manslaughter does not require proof that the defendant intended to kill or intended harm. The focus is negligence, meaning whether the driving fell below what a reasonable driver would do, and whether that alleged negligence caused the death.
That distinction matters, because the defense can often show the driving was reasonable under the circumstances, or that the alleged lapse did not cause the collision.
Is it a felony or a misdemeanor
Many vehicular manslaughter cases are charged as misdemeanors when the state’s theory is simple negligence. Misdemeanor cases can still carry serious consequences, including custody exposure and license consequences.
If the allegation involves DUI or conduct the state frames as reckless, the case can be prosecuted more severely, and the defense strategy has to address those higher-stakes theories early.
Examples of how these cases arise
Any ordinary driving task, performed negligently, can lead to a vehicular manslaughter allegation when a fatality occurs. Common scenarios include speeding, missing a stop sign, distraction inside the vehicle, and improper entry or exit from the roadway.
The defense usually focuses on reconstruction evidence and alternative causal explanations, including what other drivers did, what the roadway conditions were, and what the timing shows.
Defenses to vehicular manslaughter
A strong defense is fact-driven. Common themes include third-party fault, mechanical failure, medical emergencies, and victim conduct, as well as challenges to the state’s causation theory.
These cases often require fast evidence preservation, including vehicle data, scene documentation, witness outreach, and any available video.
Next steps
If you are facing a vehicular manslaughter allegation, do not discuss facts with anyone but your lawyer. Preserve your phone and any location data. If the vehicle has event data, keep it intact. If there is video from businesses or nearby homes, it should be requested quickly.
Early defense work is about controlling the record, challenging the state’s theory with objective evidence, and preventing a reconstruction narrative from hardening before the defense has a fair chance to test it.
Vehicular Manslaughter FAQs
These are the questions we hear first.
