Nevada Post-Conviction Petition
When your direct appeal is over and errors are still unaddressed, a post-conviction habeas corpus petition under NRS 34.726 may be the remedy. It is the last Nevada state court option before federal court — and the deadlines are strict.
17 Google reviews
Attorney Mee is a lawyer who truly cares about you not just your case. His fee was reasonable and he helped me immensely.
— Ethan BarnardWhat a post-conviction petition is — and what it is not
Many people confuse a post-conviction petition with an appeal. They are completely separate proceedings.
"Habeas corpus" is Latin for "you shall have the body." A writ of habeas corpus is a court order requiring a hearing to establish whether there is a constitutional basis for confining someone. If the court grants the petition, it holds a hearing to determine whether your confinement is lawful. A successful result means you are freed from custody on that conviction.
Direct Appeal
Challenges the trial record
You argue the judge made legal errors, the jury instructions were wrong, or the evidence was insufficient. Everything comes from the transcript and record of the trial itself. Filed within 30 days of sentencing.
Post-Conviction Petition
Challenges what the record cannot show
You raise claims that couldn't appear on the trial transcript — your lawyer's failures, evidence the prosecution hid, facts discovered after trial. Filed in district court after the direct appeal concludes.
The most important distinction: Ineffective assistance of counsel — the most common post-conviction ground — almost never appears on the trial record. The jury never hears about it, the judge never rules on it, and the transcript doesn't reflect it. That is precisely why it must come through a habeas petition rather than a direct appeal.
The one-year deadline — NRS 34.726
Miss this and the petition is almost certainly dead on arrival.
Critical deadline
1 year
From the date your conviction becomes final. For a plea, that is generally when the time to appeal ran out. For a trial conviction, it is when the direct appeal was decided.
Good cause exception
A late petition can survive if you show (1) good cause — a reason you could not have known about the claim within the deadline through reasonable diligence — and (2) actual prejudice from the constitutional violation. Courts apply this narrowly. Newly discovered evidence and actual innocence claims are the most viable paths, but neither guarantees relief.
Do not wait. If your appeal has been decided and you think there may be grounds for a habeas petition, the one-year clock is already running. The petition takes time to investigate and prepare properly. Starting early is almost always the right move.
The procedural bar — what you cannot relitigate
A post-conviction petition is not a second appeal. Nevada courts will not hear claims that were already raised and decided on direct appeal, or claims that you could have raised on appeal but chose not to. This is called the procedural bar.
The bar serves a real purpose — finality. Courts need to be able to conclude cases. But it also creates traps for defendants who were poorly advised about what to raise on appeal, or who didn't know that certain claims required a habeas petition rather than an appeal.
Barred
Arguments about trial court errors that were raised — or could have been raised — in the direct appeal.
Permitted
Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel (almost always outside the trial record). Newly discovered evidence. Brady violations not discoverable at trial. Illegal sentences.
Common grounds for post-conviction relief
These are the claims that actually succeed in Nevada habeas proceedings.
Ineffective assistance of counsel
The most common ground. Your lawyer's performance fell below professional norms and that failure changed the outcome. Strickland v. Washington sets the test — deficient performance plus prejudice. Both prongs are required.
Newly discovered evidence
Evidence that didn't exist or couldn't have been found with reasonable diligence before trial. A new witness, DNA, surveillance footage that turns up later. The evidence must be credible and material — likely to produce a different verdict.
Brady violations
The prosecution withheld evidence that was favorable to you and material to your guilt or punishment. Brady v. Maryland requires the state to disclose exculpatory evidence. If they hid it and it mattered, the conviction may be vulnerable.
Illegal sentence
The court imposed a sentence that exceeds the statutory maximum, applied the wrong category of offense, or violated double jeopardy. Illegal sentences can be challenged even outside normal deadlines in some circumstances.
Constitutional violations not raised on appeal
Certain constitutional violations — particularly those tied to trial counsel's failure to raise them — can be brought in a post-conviction petition. The procedural bar prevents relitigating issues that were raised on direct appeal, but new constitutional claims with cause for the omission may survive.
Ineffective assistance of counsel — the Strickland test explained
The most common post-conviction ground. Two requirements, both required.
Prong 1 — Deficient performance
Your attorney's performance fell below the objective standard of a reasonably competent defense attorney. Not just a bad result — actual failures that no competent lawyer would have made. Failing to investigate witnesses, not filing a motion to suppress obvious illegal evidence, missing a critical objection without any strategic reason.
Prong 2 — Prejudice
The deficient performance changed the outcome. There has to be a reasonable probability — not a certainty, but a real possibility — that the result would have been different if counsel had performed competently. If the error didn't matter to the verdict, the claim fails even if the performance was terrible.
The court presumes counsel was effective. That presumption has to be overcome with specific facts — not a general feeling that things went wrong. The strongest IAC claims have documentary support: the suppression motion that was never filed, the witness who was never contacted, the lab report counsel never reviewed.
What happens at an evidentiary hearing
An evidentiary hearing is not automatic. The court first reviews the petition and decides whether the claims — if true — would entitle you to relief. If they would, the court sets a hearing where both sides can present evidence and call witnesses.
At the hearing, your trial counsel may be called to testify about their strategic decisions. Experts may testify about what a competent attorney would have done. New witnesses whose testimony supports your claims can take the stand. Evidence that was never presented at trial can be introduced.
Getting to a hearing is itself a significant milestone. Many petitions are denied on the papers without a hearing because the claims are insufficient on their face or procedurally barred. When a court orders a hearing, it means the claims are facially credible and legally cognizable — a meaningful step toward relief.
What happens if you win — and if you lose
If the petition succeeds
A successful petition means your conviction is vacated and you cannot be held in custody on that conviction. However, winning does not always mean the case is over. The State typically has the right to retry you on the same underlying charges — for example, if the basis for relief was ineffective assistance of counsel. The exception is if the basis for relief is something that makes retrial constitutionally barred, such as double jeopardy.
If the petition is denied
A denial in district court can be appealed to the Nevada Court of Appeals or Supreme Court. If the Nevada courts ultimately deny relief, the post-conviction petition — if properly filed and decided on the merits — satisfies the exhaustion requirement for federal habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. That keeps the federal door open for constitutional claims that the Nevada courts had a fair opportunity to address.
Why this matters for federal court
Federal habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 is available to state prisoners who are being held in violation of the U.S. Constitution. But federal courts will not hear claims that have not first been fully presented to the state courts. This is called exhaustion.
A properly filed and decided Nevada habeas petition exhausts your state remedies and opens the federal door. A petition that was dismissed on procedural grounds — for being late, for raising barred claims, for failing to meet pleading requirements — can close the federal door permanently on those claims. Federal courts apply procedural default rules that honor state procedural bars.
The post-conviction petition is a gateway, not a destination. Done right, it preserves every viable constitutional claim and builds the factual record a federal court will later review. Done wrong — or skipped — it can eliminate your ability to seek federal relief altogether.
Post-Conviction Petition — Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Nevada habeas corpus proceedings.
Frequently Asked Questions
Clear answers to common record sealing questions.
Think you have grounds for a petition?
The one-year clock does not stop while you are thinking it over. Call or text to talk through the facts and find out whether a post-conviction petition is worth pursuing.
More about Nevada criminal appeals
Tap any topic for the full guide.